AMD A4 Micro-6400T vs AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335

Comparative analysis of AMD A4 Micro-6400T and AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4 Micro-6400T

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 4.5 Watt vs 18 Watt
• 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1082 vs 529
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1574 vs 1289

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335

• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 570 vs 540
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 786 vs 766

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4 Micro-6400T
CPU 2: AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	540 570
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1082 529
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	766 786
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1574 1289

Compare specifications (specs)