AMD A6-3650 vs Intel Celeron 450

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3650 and Intel Celeron 450 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3650

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
• Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
• 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1038 vs 763
• 4.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2070 vs 433
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1128 vs 971

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 450

• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 963 vs 333

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-3650
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 450

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1038 763
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2070 433
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	333 963
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1128 971

Compare specifications (specs)