AMD A6-9225 vs AMD FX-6300

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-9225 and AMD FX-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9225

• Around 28% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 70.50°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 95 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6300

• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
• Around 46% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
• 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1486 vs 1161
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4220 vs 1338
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.894 vs 1.391

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-9225
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1161 1486
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1338 4220
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1.391 6.894

Compare specifications (specs)