AMD Athlon X4 850 vs AMD Athlon X2 7550
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon X4 850 and AMD Athlon X2 7550 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X4 850
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 56% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1231 vs 934
- 3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2657 vs 900
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Jul 2015 vs December 2008 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1231 vs 934 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2657 vs 900 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 7550
- 262144x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 4MB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon X4 850
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 7550
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon X4 850 | AMD Athlon X2 7550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1231 | 934 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2657 | 900 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1446 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2427 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon X4 850 | AMD Athlon X2 7550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Godaveri | Kuma |
Launch date | Jul 2015 | December 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1986 | 1996 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | |
Die size | 245 mm² | 285 mm |
L1 cache | 256K | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4MB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Transistor count | 2,411 million | 450 million |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 MHz, Dual-channel | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM2+ | AM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCIe configurations | Gen 3, 16 Lanes, (CPU only) | |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |