AMD Ryzen 3 7320U vs AMD FX-6300

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 7320U and AMD FX-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 7320U

• CPU is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
• Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
• Around 35% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 70.50°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 6 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 95 Watt
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2345 vs 1486
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8685 vs 4220

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6300

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• Around 13% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2097152x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2345 1486
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	8685 4220

Compare specifications (specs)