AMD Athlon 200GE vs AMD A6-9500
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 200GE and AMD A6-9500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 200GE
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1799 vs 1624
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4114 vs 1869
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 740 vs 484
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1735 vs 800
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1303 vs 1134
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2701 vs 2148
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1303 vs 1134
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2701 vs 2148
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | June 2018 vs 27 July 2017 |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 90°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1799 vs 1624 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4114 vs 1869 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 740 vs 484 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1735 vs 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1303 vs 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2701 vs 2148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1303 vs 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2701 vs 2148 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9500
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6783 vs 6495
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6783 vs 6495
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6783 vs 6495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6783 vs 6495 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 200GE
CPU 2: AMD A6-9500
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon 200GE | AMD A6-9500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1799 | 1624 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4114 | 1869 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 740 | 484 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1735 | 800 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1303 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2701 | 2148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6495 | 6783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1303 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2701 | 2148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6495 | 6783 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 200GE | AMD A6-9500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zen | Bristol Ridge |
Family | AMD Athlon Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Launch date | June 2018 | 27 July 2017 |
OPN Tray | YD200GC6M2OFB | AD9500AGM23AB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Place in performance rating | 1172 | 1191 |
Series | AMD Athlon Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD A6-Series APU for Desktops |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | |
OPN PIB | AD9500AGABBOX | |
Price now | $56.83 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.52 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Compute Cores | 5 | 8 |
Die size | 192 mm | 246 mm |
L1 cache | 192 KB | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 90°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 3 | 6 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Transistor count | 4800 million | 1178 million |
Unlocked | ||
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2667 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics max frequency | 1000 MHz | 1029 MHz |
iGPU core count | 3 | 6 |
Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 3 Graphics | Radeon R5 Series |
Enduro | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM4 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
Vulkan |