AMD Athlon 3000G vs AMD A10-9700

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD A10-9700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 3000G

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 90°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1963 vs 1619
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4455 vs 3555

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9700

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 3000G
CPU 2: AMD A10-9700

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1963 1619
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	4455 3555

Compare specifications (specs)