AMD Athlon 3000G vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD Ryzen 3 2200G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 3000G

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2047 vs 1963
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6746 vs 4455

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 3000G
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1963 2047
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	4455 6746

Compare specifications (specs)