AMD Athlon 64 2650e vs AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 2650e and AMD Athlon XP 1900+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2650e

  • CPU is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 53 Watt
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 274 vs 203
Specifications (specs)
Launch date January 2009 vs January 2001
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 130 nm
L2 cache 512 KB vs 256 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 53 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 274 vs 203

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1900+

  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 312 vs 304
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 312 vs 304

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 2650e
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 1900+

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
304
312
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
274
203
Name AMD Athlon 64 2650e AMD Athlon XP 1900+
PassMark - Single thread mark 304 312
PassMark - CPU mark 274 203

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 2650e AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Essentials

Architecture codename Lima Thoroughbred
Launch date January 2009 January 2001
Place in performance rating 3242 3233
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 77 mm 80 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 256 KB
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 122 million 37 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2 A
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 53 Watt