AMD Athlon 64 3300+ vs AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 3300+ and AMD Athlon 64 3000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3300+

  • CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 734 vs 549
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 576 vs 463
Specifications (specs)
Launch date April 2004 vs December 2003
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 734 vs 549
PassMark - CPU mark 576 vs 463

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3000+

  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L2 cache 512 KB vs 256 KB

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 3300+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3000+

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
734
549
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
576
463
Name AMD Athlon 64 3300+ AMD Athlon 64 3000+
PassMark - Single thread mark 734 549
PassMark - CPU mark 576 463
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 850
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 834

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 3300+ AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Essentials

Architecture codename NewCastle Clawhammer
Launch date April 2004 December 2003
Place in performance rating 2675 2691
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $65
Price now $74.95
Value for money (0-100) 1.82

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 144 mm 193 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 256 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 130 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz 2 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 105 million 69 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 754 754
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 89 Watt 89 Watt