AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 89 Watt
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Name | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1285 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 219 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 398 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Windsor | Manchester |
Launch date | May 2006 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 3308 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $309 | |
Price now | $179.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.80 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 220 mm | 156 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 154 million | 154 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |