AMD Athlon II P320 vs AMD Turion 64 ML-32

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II P320 and AMD Turion 64 ML-32 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II P320

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.1 GHz vs 1.79 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 820 vs 321
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 702 vs 285

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II P320
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 ML-32

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	820 321
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	702 285

Compare specifications (specs)