AMD Athlon II X3 435 vs AMD Athlon 64 2800+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X3 435 and AMD Athlon 64 2800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X3 435

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 1
• Around 61% higher clock speed: 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
• 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1166 vs 511
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1630 vs 438

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2800+

• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 95 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X3 435
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 2800+

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1166 511
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1630 438

Compare specifications (specs)