AMD Athlon II X3 460 vs AMD Athlon 64 LE-1620

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X3 460 and AMD Athlon 64 LE-1620 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X3 460

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 1
• Around 42% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
• 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1395 vs 475
• 4.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2008 vs 421

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1620

• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1101 vs 383
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1074 vs 1013

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X3 460
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1620

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1395 475
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2008 421
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	383 1101
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1013 1074

Compare specifications (specs)