AMD Athlon II X4 630 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X4 630 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X4 630
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2168 vs 1210
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1155 vs 738
- 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.635 vs 0.33
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.166 vs 0.099
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.684 vs 2.408
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | September 2009 vs January 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2168 vs 1210 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1155 vs 738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.635 vs 0.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.166 vs 0.099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.684 vs 2.408 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1234 vs 1130
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 vs 347
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 8.536
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1234 vs 1130 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 422 vs 347 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.311 vs 8.536 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon II X4 630 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1130 | 1234 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2168 | 1210 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 347 | 422 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1155 | 738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.635 | 0.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.536 | 26.311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.166 | 0.099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.684 | 2.408 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2400 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon II X4 630 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Propus | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | September 2009 | January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $63 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2975 | 2981 |
| Price now | $42.99 | $129.95 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 21.49 | 4.87 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | E8400 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 169 mm | 107 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 300 million | 410 million |
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||