AMD Athlon II X4 645 vs Intel Celeron E3200
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X4 645 and Intel Celeron E3200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X4 645
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 29% higher clock speed: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1256 vs 981
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2351 vs 900
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 375 vs 259
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1215 vs 436
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | September 2010 vs August 2009 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1256 vs 981 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2351 vs 900 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 375 vs 259 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1215 vs 436 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E3200
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E3200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X4 645 | Intel Celeron E3200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1256 | 981 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2351 | 900 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 375 | 259 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1215 | 436 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.496 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X4 645 | Intel Celeron E3200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Propus | Wolfdale |
Launch date | September 2010 | August 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $52 |
Place in performance rating | 2780 | 2793 |
Price now | $49.99 | $51.99 |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 7.88 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | E3200 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 169 mm | 82 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 300 million | 228 million |
Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |