AMD C-30 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-62

Comparative analysis of AMD C-30 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-62 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD C-30

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 QL-62

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 67% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 623 vs 375
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 525 vs 178

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD C-30
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 QL-62

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	375 623
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	178 525

Compare specifications (specs)