AMD E2-3200 vs AMD Phenom X3 8600

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-3200 and AMD Phenom X3 8600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3200

  • CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
  • Around 36% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1401 vs 1030
Specifications (specs)
Launch date September 2011 vs March 2008
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1401 vs 1030

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X3 8600

  • 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
  • Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2486 vs 2253
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 3 vs 2
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core)
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 2486 vs 2253

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-3200
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X3 8600

Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1401
1030
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
2253
2486
Name AMD E2-3200 AMD Phenom X3 8600
PassMark - Single thread mark 971
PassMark - CPU mark 968
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1401 1030
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 2253 2486

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD E2-3200 AMD Phenom X3 8600

Essentials

Architecture codename Llano Toliman
Launch date September 2011 March 2008
Place in performance rating 2002 2025
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 228 mm 285 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 512 KB (per core)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 65 nm
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz 2.3 GHz
Number of cores 2 3
Transistor count 1178 million 450 million
L3 cache 2048 KB (shared)

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported FM1 AM2+
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)