AMD E2-7110 vs AMD E2-3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-7110 and AMD E2-3000M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-7110

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1515 vs 668

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3000M

• Around 33% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 731 vs 611
• 5.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1174 vs 205
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1887 vs 664

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-7110
CPU 2: AMD E2-3000M

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	611 731
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1515 668
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	205 1174
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	664 1887

Compare specifications (specs)