AMD EPYC 4564P vs AMD EPYC 9274F
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 4564P and AMD EPYC 9274F processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 4564P
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 5.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
- 699050.7x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 262144x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4388 vs 3371
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2024 vs 10 Nov 2022 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) vs 256MB (shared) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 320 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4388 vs 3371 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9274F
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 16
- 16 more threads: 48 vs 32
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 112943 vs 65688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 24 vs 16 |
| Number of threads | 48 vs 32 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 112943 vs 65688 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 4564P
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9274F
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 4564P | AMD EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4388 | 3371 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 65688 | 112943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 4564P | AMD EPYC 9274F | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 21 May 2024 | 10 Nov 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $3060 |
| Place in performance rating | 34 | 24 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 4.5 GHz | 4.05 GHz |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm² | 8x 72 mm² |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 256MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47°C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 5.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 16 | 24 |
| Number of threads | 32 | 48 |
| Transistor count | 13,140 million | 52,560 million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 MHz, Twelve-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | AM5 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 320-400 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 28 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |
