AMD EPYC 7232P vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 7232P and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7232P

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
• 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm, 14 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 17017 vs 11240

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

• Around 13% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
• Around 13% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1884 vs 1549

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 7232P
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1549 1884
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	17017 11240

Compare specifications (specs)