AMD EPYC 7513 vs AMD A6-9500

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 7513 and AMD A6-9500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7513

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 30 more cores, run more applications at once: 32 vs 2
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm+ vs 28 nm
• 16x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2730 vs 1630
• 51.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 96409 vs 1879

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9500

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• Around 4% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.65 GHz
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 200 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 7513
CPU 2: AMD A6-9500

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2730 1630
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	96409 1879

Compare specifications (specs)