AMD EPYC 8434PN vs AMD EPYC 8324PN
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 8434PN and AMD EPYC 8324PN processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 8434PN
- 16 more cores, run more applications at once: 48 vs 32
- 32 more threads: 96 vs 64
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Number of cores | 48 vs 32 |
| Number of threads | 96 vs 64 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1 MB (per core) |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 8324PN
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 155 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 155 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 8434PN | AMD EPYC 8324PN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 18 Sep 2023 | 18 Sep 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3150 | $2125 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2000 MHz | 2.05 GHz |
| Die size | 4x 73 mm² | 4x 73 mm² |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 48 | 32 |
| Number of threads | 96 | 64 |
| Transistor count | 35,500 million | 35,500 million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | SP6 | SP6 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 155 Watt | 130 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 96 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 96 Lanes, (CPU only) |