AMD FX-6350 vs AMD Athlon X2 4050e

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6350 and AMD Athlon X2 4050e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6350

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
• Around 100% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 65 nm
• Around 13% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1570 vs 751
• 6.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4588 vs 674
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2117 vs 1667
• 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.641 vs 0.84

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 4050e

• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 81% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 996 vs 551

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD FX-6350
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 4050e

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1570 751
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	4588 674
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	551 996
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2117 1667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	6.641 0.84

Compare specifications (specs)