AMD FX-7500 vs AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-7500 and AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-7500

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 38% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 973 vs 820
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1966 vs 695

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD FX-7500
CPU 2: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	973 820
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1966 695

Compare specifications (specs)