AMD FX-8140 vs AMD A10-5800K

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8140 and AMD A10-5800K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8140

• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4860 vs 2963

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5800K

• Around 31% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1497 vs 1273

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD FX-8140
CPU 2: AMD A10-5800K

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1273 1497
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	4860 2963

Compare specifications (specs)