AMD Opteron 1385 vs AMD Opteron 6328

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 1385 and AMD Opteron 6328 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 1385

• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 6328

• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.7x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1442 vs 1035
• 5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 9508 vs 1898

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 1385
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 6328

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1035 1442
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1898 9508

Compare specifications (specs)