AMD Opteron 1389 vs AMD EPYC 7702
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 1389 and AMD EPYC 7702 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 1389
- 64x more maximum memory size: 256 TB vs 4 TB
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 200 Watt
Maximum memory size | 256 TB vs 4 TB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7702
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 60 more cores, run more applications at once: 64 vs 4
- 124 more threads: 128 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm, 14 nm vs 45 nm
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 16x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 42.7x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2116 vs 1102
- 44.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 93307 vs 2079
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Aug 2019 vs 1 Jun 2009 |
Number of cores | 64 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 128 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm, 14 nm vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 4 MB vs 512 KB |
L2 cache | 32 MB vs 2 MB |
L3 cache | 256 MB vs 6 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2116 vs 1102 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 93307 vs 2079 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron 1389
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 7702
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Opteron 1389 | AMD EPYC 7702 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1102 | 2116 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2079 | 93307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron 1389 | AMD EPYC 7702 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | K10 | Zen 2 |
Launch date | 1 Jun 2009 | 7 Aug 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $269 | $6450 |
Place in performance rating | 2143 | 153 |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
OPN PIB | 100-100000038WOF | |
OPN Tray | 100-000000038 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
L1 cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 32 MB |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 256 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
Number of cores | 4 | 64 |
Number of threads | 4 | 128 |
Maximum frequency | 3.35 GHz | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum memory size | 256 TB | 4 TB |
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 | DDR4-3200 |
ECC memory support | ||
Max memory channels | 8 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | AM2+, AM3 | SP3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 200 Watt |
Socket Count | 1P/2P | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 128 | |
PCI Express revision | 4.0 | |
PCIe configurations | x16, x8 |