AMD Opteron 156 vs AMD Opteron X2 275
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 156 and AMD Opteron X2 275 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 156
- Around 36% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 275
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 104 Watt
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 104 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron 156 | AMD Opteron X2 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Venus | Italy |
| Launch date | May 2005 | May 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 106 million | 233 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | 939 | 940 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 104 Watt | 95 Watt |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Opteron 156 with others
AMDOpteron 156 vs
AMDOpteron X2 275
AMDOpteron 156 vs
AMDOpteron X2 270
AMDOpteron 156 vs
AMDOpteron X2 265
