AMD Opteron 3320 EE vs AMD Opteron 154

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 3320 EE and AMD Opteron 154 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 3320 EE

• CPU is newer: launch date 18 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
• Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 104 Watt
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 774 vs 534
• 5.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2675 vs 457

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 154

• Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 3320 EE
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 154

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	774 534
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2675 457

Compare specifications (specs)