AMD Opteron 43GK HE vs AMD Opteron X2 175
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 43GK HE and AMD Opteron X2 175 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 43GK HE
- 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
- Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 69% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 110 Watt
Number of cores | 8 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron 43GK HE | AMD Opteron X2 175 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Seoul | Denmark |
Launch date | n/d | August 2005 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 315 mm | |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 8192 KB | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 2 |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 233 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Sockets supported | C32 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 110 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |