AMD PRO A6-9500 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A6-9500 and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A6-9500
- 15.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.416 vs 6.358
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.416 vs 6.358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm FinFET vs 28 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2150 vs 1520
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8731 vs 1770
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.311 vs 19.633
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 375.23 vs 280.611
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.018 vs 1.627
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.366 vs 30.599
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 February 2018 vs 3 October 2016 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 90°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm FinFET vs 28 nm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2150 vs 1520 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8731 vs 1770 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 vs 19.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 375.23 vs 280.611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 vs 1.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 vs 30.599 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD PRO A6-9500
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A6-9500 | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1520 | 2150 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1770 | 8731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.633 | 42.311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 280.611 | 375.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.627 | 3.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.599 | 45.366 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.416 | 6.358 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 853 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3173 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2013 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3310 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10372 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3310 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10372 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD PRO A6-9500 | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Launch date | 3 October 2016 | 12 February 2018 |
| OPN Tray | AD950BAGM23AB | YD2400C5M4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Place in performance rating | 667 | 376 |
| Series | AMD PRO A-Series A6 APU for Desktops | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture codename | Zen | |
| OPN PIB | YD2400C5FBBOX | |
| Price now | $158.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.20 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm FinFET |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 95°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 11 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| Transistor count | 4500 Million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2933 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 1029 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Processor graphics | R5 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| iGPU core count | 11 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | 46-65 Watt |
| Sockets supported | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD PRO A6-9500 with others
AMDPRO A6-9500 vs
AMDRyzen 9 PRO 3900
AMDPRO A6-9500 vs
IntelCore i9-10900
AMDPRO A6-9500 vs
AMDRyzen 5 4600G
AMDPRO A6-9500 vs
IntelCore i9-10900F
AMDPRO A6-9500 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 4400G
AMDPRO A6-9500 vs
IntelCore i7-11700
