AMD Phenom II X2 560 BE vs AMD Phenom II X4 900e

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X2 560 BE and AMD Phenom II X4 900e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X2 560 BE

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • Around 38% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1389 vs 917
Specifications (specs)
Launch date September 2010 vs June 2009
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Maximum frequency 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1389 vs 917

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 900e

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 80 Watt
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1505 vs 1375
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 4 vs 2
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 1505 vs 1375

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X2 560 BE
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 900e

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1389
917
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1375
1505
Name AMD Phenom II X2 560 BE AMD Phenom II X4 900e
PassMark - Single thread mark 1389 917
PassMark - CPU mark 1375 1505
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 426
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 764

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Phenom II X2 560 BE AMD Phenom II X4 900e

Essentials

Architecture codename Callisto Deneb
Launch date September 2010 June 2009
Place in performance rating 2296 2285
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 258 mm 258 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 512 KB (per core)
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared) 6144 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 45 nm
Maximum frequency 3.3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Transistor count 758 million 758 million
Unlocked

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3 AM3
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt