AMD Phenom II X3 B73 vs AMD Athlon X2 4850e
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X3 B73 and AMD Athlon X2 4850e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X3 B73
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1091 vs 903
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1673 vs 783
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2009 vs March 2008 |
Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1091 vs 903 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1673 vs 783 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 4850e
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X3 B73
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 4850e
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X3 B73 | AMD Athlon X2 4850e |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1091 | 903 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1673 | 783 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1198 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X3 B73 | AMD Athlon X2 4850e | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Heka | Brisbane |
Launch date | October 2009 | March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | |
Place in performance rating | 2171 | 2174 |
Price now | $75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.75 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 258 mm | 126 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 3 | 2 |
Transistor count | 758 million | 154 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |