AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE vs AMD Turion II Neo K665
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE and AMD Turion II Neo K665 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 35% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1024 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II Neo K665
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
CPU 2: AMD Turion II Neo K665
Name | AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE | AMD Turion II Neo K665 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 944 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1669 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE | AMD Turion II Neo K665 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Champlain | Geneva |
Launch date | 12 May 2010 | 12 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 2337 | not rated |
Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | AMD Turion II Neo |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 3600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | S1 | S1g4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |