AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE vs Intel Celeron E3200

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Intel Celeron E3200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE

• CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
• Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• 6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1453 vs 981
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3795 vs 900
• Around 78% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 460 vs 259
• 4.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1974 vs 436

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E3200

• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E3200

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1453 981
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3795 900
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	460 259
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1974 436

Compare specifications (specs)