AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE vs Intel Celeron E3300

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Intel Celeron E3300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE

• CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
• Around 28% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
• 6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1453 vs 918
• 4.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3795 vs 809
• Around 49% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 460 vs 308
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1974 vs 541

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E3300

• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E3300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1453 918
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3795 809
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	460 308
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1974 541

Compare specifications (specs)