AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W) vs Intel Pentium III 1400
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W) and Intel Pentium III 1400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 71% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 64x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Launch date | March 2008 vs December 2001 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 8 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium III 1400
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 31.2 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31.2 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W)
CPU 2: Intel Pentium III 1400
Name | AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W) | Intel Pentium III 1400 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 283 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 901 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.726 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 272 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W) | Intel Pentium III 1400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Agena | Tualatin |
Launch date | March 2008 | December 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 3252 | 3256 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 285 mm | 80 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 8 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Transistor count | 450 million | 44 million |
Base frequency | 1.40 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 133 MHz FSB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 69°C | |
VID voltage range | 1.5V | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2+ | PPGA370 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 31.2 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology |