AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs AMD Opteron 6348

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and AMD Opteron 6348 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 70.40°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
• Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 115 Watt
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1912 vs 1344

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 6348

• 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 4
• 8 more threads: 12 vs 4
• Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 13470 vs 6131

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 6348

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1912 1344
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6131 13470

Compare specifications (specs)