AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs AMD FX-6100

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G and AMD FX-6100 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

• CPU is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
• Around 3% higher clock speed: 4.0 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
• Around 36% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 70°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
• Around 93% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2546 vs 1318
• 3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 10926 vs 3695

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6100

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• Around 13% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
CPU 2: AMD FX-6100

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2546 1318
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	10926 3695

Compare specifications (specs)