AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF vs AMD E2-3200

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF and AMD E2-3200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

  • 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
  • Around 50% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 32 nm
Number of cores 6 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 32 nm

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
CPU 2: AMD E2-3200

Name AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF AMD E2-3200
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 3319
PassMark - Single thread mark 971
PassMark - CPU mark 968
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1401
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 2253

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF AMD E2-3200

Essentials

Architecture codename Zen+ Llano
Launch date Q1'2020 September 2011
OPN Tray YD1600BBAFBOX
Place in performance rating 2027 2002
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

Base frequency 3.2 GHz
L3 cache 16 MB
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 32 nm
Maximum frequency 3.6 GHz 2.4 GHz
Number of cores 6 2
Number of threads 12
64 bit support
Die size 228 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core)
Transistor count 1178 million

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 39.74 GB/s
Maximum memory size 64 GB
Supported memory types DDR4-2667 DDR3

Compatibility

Sockets supported AM4 FM1
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 20

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)