AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
• Around 21% higher clock speed: 4.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 4 nm vs 14 nm FinFET
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3627 vs 2156
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 23989 vs 8534

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3627 2156
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	23989 8534

Compare specifications (specs)