AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs AMD A12-9800

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and AMD A12-9800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 90°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2270 vs 1698
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 13424 vs 3680

Reasons to consider the AMD A12-9800

• Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
CPU 2: AMD A12-9800

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2270 1698
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	13424 3680

Compare specifications (specs)