AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE vs AMD A10-7860K

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and AMD A10-7860K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• Around 33% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 71.30°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2236 vs 1488
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8252 vs 3284

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7860K

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
CPU 2: AMD A10-7860K

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2236 1488
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	8252 3284

Compare specifications (specs)