AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs AMD EPYC 7F52
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and AMD EPYC 7F52 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher clock speed: 5.1 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 4 nm vs 7 nm, 14 nm
- 8.6x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 240 Watt
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3716 vs 2439
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Apr 2024 vs 14 Apr 2020 |
Maximum frequency | 5.1 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm, 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 240 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 3716 vs 2439 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7F52
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 8
- 16 more threads: 32 vs 16
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 16x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 64806 vs 24431
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 16 vs 8 |
Number of threads | 32 vs 16 |
L1 cache | 1 MB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 256 MB vs 16 MB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 64806 vs 24431 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 7F52
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 3716 | 2439 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 24431 | 64806 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 16 Apr 2024 | 14 Apr 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 266 |
Architecture codename | Zen 2 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3100 | |
OPN PIB | 100-000000140WOF | |
OPN Tray | 100-000000140 | |
Vertical segment | Server | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Die size | 178 mm² | |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 256 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Maximum frequency | 5.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 16 |
Number of threads | 16 | 32 |
Transistor count | 25,000 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-3200 |
Max memory channels | 8 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 190.73 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 4 TB | |
Compatibility |
||
Configurable TDP | 15-30 Watt | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FP7 | SP3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 240 Watt |
Socket Count | 1P/2P | |
Peripherals |
||
PCIe configurations | Gen 4, 20 Lanes, (CPU only) | x16, x8 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 128 | |
PCI Express revision | 4.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |