AMD Ryzen 9 4900H vs Intel Xeon W-3235

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H and Intel Xeon W-3235 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

• CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 46% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 72°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 180 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2706 vs 2638

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W-3235

• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 8
• 8 more threads: 24 vs 16
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 60% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 25530 vs 19156

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
CPU 2: Intel Xeon W-3235

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2706 2638
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	19156 25530

Compare specifications (specs)