AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs AMD Athlon 3000G

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 and AMD Athlon 3000G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 95 °C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6998 vs 4490

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 3000G

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1987 vs 1933

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 3000G

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1933 1987
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6998 4490

Compare specifications (specs)