AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 vs AMD A10-7890K

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 and AMD A10-7890K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• Around 45% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 72.40°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 95 Watt
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2439 vs 1566
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 13016 vs 3522

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7890K

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• Around 9% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 3.95 GHz
• Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516
CPU 2: AMD A10-7890K

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2439 1566
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	13016 3522

Compare specifications (specs)