AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs AMD Sempron 2600+

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and AMD Sempron 2600+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

• CPU is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 15 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 1
• Around 150% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 90 nm
• 12x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 64x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 7x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2278 vs 325
• 109.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 27643 vs 253

Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2600+

• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 180 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 2600+

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2278 325
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	27643 253

Compare specifications (specs)