AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX vs AMD A10-9700
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and AMD A10-9700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 20 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 4
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2339 vs 1619
- 8.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 31038 vs 3555
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1016 vs 493
- 7.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 10347 vs 1465
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | October 2018 vs 27 July 2017 |
| Number of cores | 24 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| L2 cache | 12 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2339 vs 1619 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 31038 vs 3555 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1016 vs 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 10347 vs 1465 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9700
- Around 32% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 68°C
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C vs 68°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
CPU 2: AMD A10-9700
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | AMD A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2339 | 1619 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 31038 | 3555 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1016 | 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 10347 | 1465 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.497 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.004 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.928 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.933 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7174 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7174 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | AMD A10-9700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Launch date | October 2018 | 27 July 2017 |
| OPN PIB | YD297XAZAFWOF | AD9700AGABBOX |
| OPN Tray | YD297XAZUHCAF | AD9700AGM44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Place in performance rating | 961 | 991 |
| Price now | $1,299.99 | $79.99 |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.52 | 20.04 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Die size | 213 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 2304 KB | |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 68°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 24 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 48 | |
| Transistor count | 19200 million | 1178 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | sTR4 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | |
| Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 1029 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 6 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R7 Series | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
